FHEM Forum

FHEM => Anfängerfragen => Thema gestartet von: Papaloewe am 28 Juli 2017, 16:42:07

Titel: [erledigt] PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric
Beitrag von: Papaloewe am 28 Juli 2017, 16:42:07
Seit ca. einer Woche habe ich diese Meldungen haufenweise im Log:
2017.07.28 16:36:05 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at (eval 215340) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:36:05 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at (eval 215340) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:35:32 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at (eval 215289) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:35:32 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at (eval 215289) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:35:01 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at (eval 215234) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:35:01 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at (eval 215234) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:34:28 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at (eval 215095) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:34:28 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at (eval 215095) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:33:55 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at (eval 215029) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:33:55 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at (eval 215029) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:33:22 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at (eval 214977) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:33:22 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at (eval 214977) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:32:50 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at (eval 214930) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:32:50 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at (eval 214930) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:32:18 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at (eval 214845) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:32:18 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at (eval 214845) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:31:46 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at (eval 214807) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:31:46 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at (eval 214807) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:31:15 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at (eval 214735) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:31:15 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at (eval 214735) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:30:43 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at (eval 214688) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:30:43 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at (eval 214688) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:30:12 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at (eval 214524) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:30:12 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at (eval 214524) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:29:40 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at (eval 214458) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:29:40 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at (eval 214458) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:29:09 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at (eval 214383) line 1.
2017.07.28 16:29:09 1: PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at (eval 214383) line 1.


Wie kann ich herausfinden an was es liegt?

Bin für jeden Hinweis dankbar.

Gruß
Thomas
Titel: Antw:PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric
Beitrag von: herrmannj am 28 Juli 2017, 16:49:58
stacktrace aktivieren. (cmdref - global - stacktrace)
Titel: Antw:PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric
Beitrag von: Papaloewe am 28 Juli 2017, 17:22:26
ok, vielen Dank der Schubser hat mir sehr geholfen.

Es lag an einem DOIF... :-*
Titel: Antw:PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric
Beitrag von: Damian am 28 Juli 2017, 21:13:37
Zitat von: Papaloewe am 28 Juli 2017, 17:22:26
ok, vielen Dank der Schubser hat mir sehr geholfen.

Es lag an einem DOIF... :-*

Mit der aktuellen Version von DOIF wird im Log protokolliert in welchem DOIF in welcher Bedingung die Warnung vorliegt.
Titel: Antw:[erledigt] PERL WARNING: Argument "" isn't numeric
Beitrag von: Papaloewe am 28 Juli 2017, 22:09:04
Dann lag es am Verbote Level 1, dass ich dies Meldungen vom DOIF nicht gesehen habe. 8)